Legacy of Zhang San Feng: 10 Questions to the Grandmaster

[barrys]

Who was Zhang San Feng?

[barrys]

The place of Zhang San Feng in the history of Tai Chi Chuan, Chi Kung and Meditation

[barrys]

Dear Sifu,

Thank you for this wonderful opportunity to ask a living master some questions.

I really enjoyed reading your chapter in the book "Your True Nature: The Wisdom of Living Masters". I also enjoyed the chapter by Mooji. In it he suggested a good question to ask a living master if one was lucky enough to meet one. So, for my and everyone's benefit - those who are already coming to the Legacy of Zhang San Feng course, those who have yet to decide to come to the course, and those who have decided not to come on the course -

Can an individual in the modern age find and become what the Buddha, Christ or any of the great spiritual masters discovered - now, today and, if not, what stops them. How much is it a question of luck. Do they need to leave their present role in life, family, career, in order to discover and live this. What part can the Legacy that Zhang San Feng handed down to us play in this process?

Also, I have been interested in stories of some Tai Chi Chuan masters being irritable. Is this true? If so, what mistakes might they have made to allow this to happen and what are the key ways of ensuring it doesn't happen in our own practice?

With metta,

Barry

[Tim]

Dear Sifu, now that you have released the video and picture series for the San Feng Wudang Set, would now be a good time to ask what discoveries and 'ah ha' moments you have experienced during composing the set?

[Tim]

Dear Sifu,

There are many varied stories of ZSF life and training, that only confuse (see http://www.egreenway.com/taichichuan/chang1.htm). From your research what was ZSF history prior to coming to Wudang. i.e What Of the Shaolin arts would he have practiced, how did he come to train Shaolin, what Taoist training did he have?

[barrys]

Question and Answer - 1 - Part 1

Sorry for my tardiness. I have had some answers from Sifu for a while but it has been rather hectic here . Now it is a public holiday in the UK so I have time to post this properly.

Question and Answer - 1 - Part 1

Question 1

1a) I am a practitioner of mainly Taijiquan (Yang Style) but my knowledge on the origins of Taijiquan is very basic. I have heard that Taijiquan was invented by Zhang San Feng and in some of the Taijiquan classics (such as Yang Pan Hou’s 40 Chapters) it says that Zhang created Taijiquan by essentially “reversing the process of Shaolin.” Would you please be able to explain exactly what process of his Shaolin training Zhang San Feng reversed. 



Please note the following text which explains my previous knowledge of Shaolin and Taijiquan as I have come to understand them, which might help in explaining my question, and also I would like to let Sifu know the extent of my existing knowledge (rightly or wrongly) so that Sifu can help to clarify where I may be lacking in knowledge on account of the following bold description:



I know some say that Shaolin is not internal and Taijiquan is, is wrong on account of the former i.e. Shaolin is an internal art but I think the way in which Shaolin and Taijiquan are internal is a little different. As far as I know, Taijiquan uses the yi aspect of the shen to lead chi and subsequently you get jin power due to yi leading chi which leads jin, as described in the classics.


Shaolin, on the other hand use li, or brute force to somehow lead chi by contract/relax actions of the muscles in coordination with breathing. The energy then flows into the meridians via this mechanism. It is similar to Yi Jin Jing methods I believe. So one uses li and the other uses yi, I wonder if this develops a different quality of internal force as well and perhaps one is more superior than the other?




1b) In Yang Pan Hou's 40 Chapters I have read regarding 2-man Push Hands sensitivity training that Zang San Feng said in brief and to the nearest meaning, “to seize the female within our own bodies is not as good as the interaction of yin and yang between two males.” This is concerning the idea of xue jin and placing the force of the opponent in the dan tian. Would Sifu kindly be able to explain more about what Zhang San Feng meant by this statement and how it works in practice? Do Shaolin practitioners work with this idea or is it purely a training for Taijiquan practitioners?



Jp571


Answer

There has been a long debate whether it was Zhang San Feng or Chen Wang Ting who invented Taijiquan. The word “invented” is not appropriate as no one invented Taijiquan. Taijiquan evolved from Shaolin Kungfu. Shaolin Kungfu was also not invented. It evolved from actual fighting.

In other words, people fought, at first randomly. From their fighting, a system of martial art evolved over many centuries at the Shaolin Temple, and this system was called Shaolin Kungfu. Much later due to expedient needs and other factors, Shaolin Kungfu evolved into Taijiquan.

Instead of referring to the person who was most outstanding in the evolution of Shaolin Kungfu into Taijiquan, in the Chinese language he is referred to as the First Patriarch. So, instead of debating whether it was Zhang San Feng or Chen Wang Ting who invented Taijiquan, the Chinese debated whether it was Zhang San Feng or Chen Wang Ting who was regarded as the First Patriarch of Taijiquan.

Most Taijiquan practitioners and the general public regard Zhang San Feng as the First Patriarch of Taijiquan. Most practitioners of Chen Style Taijiquan, understandably, regard Chen Wang Ting as the First Patriarch. The following brief historical background may help one to an informed opinion.

Zhang San Feng who lived in the 13th century practiced Shaolin Kungfu at the Shaolin Temple in Henan. Having attained a very high level of Shaolin Kungfu, Zhang San Feng travelled throughout China as a Taoist hermit and eventually settled on the Wudang Mountain.

The term “Taijiquan” was unknown at that time. What Zhang San Feng practiced on Wudang Mountain was called Shaolin Kungfu, but to differentiate the style of Shaolin Kungfu he practiced on Wudang Mountain from that practiced at the Shaolin Temple in Henan, Zhang San Feng’s Shaolin Kungfu was called Wudang Shaolin Kungfu, and that at the Shaolin Temple was called Henan Shaolin Kungfu. Later Wudang Shaolin kungfu was shortened to Wudang Kungfu.

About 4 centuries later in the 16th century, Chen Wang Ting, a retired Ming Dynasty general, practiced Wudang Kungfu in a Chen village in Henan. Chen Wang Ting was also a scholar, and he applied Taiji philosophy of yin-yang to explain the principles of the Wudang Kungfu he practiced and taught exclusively to members of the Chen village. Later Wudang Kungfu was called Taijiquan.

“Taiji” means the Cosmos in Chinese, and “quan” means kungfu. Hence, Taijiquan means Cosmos Kungfu ...

(Part 2 follows)

[barrys]

Question and Answer - 1 - Part 2

Question and Answer - 1 - Part 2

Question 1 (Original question)

1a) I am a practitioner of mainly Taijiquan (Yang Style) but my knowledge on the origins of Taijiquan is very basic. I have heard that Taijiquan was invented by Zhang San Feng and in some of the Taijiquan classics (such as Yang Pan Hou’s 40 Chapters) it says that Zhang created Taijiquan by essentially “reversing the process of Shaolin.” Would you please be able to explain exactly what process of his Shaolin training Zhang San Feng reversed. 



Please note the following text which explains my previous knowledge of Shaolin and Taijiquan as I have come to understand them, which might help in explaining my question, and also I would like to let Sifu know the extent of my existing knowledge (rightly or wrongly) so that Sifu can help to clarify where I may be lacking in knowledge on account of the following bold description:



I know some say that Shaolin is not internal and Taijiquan is, is wrong on account of the former i.e. Shaolin is an internal art but I think the way in which Shaolin and Taijiquan are internal is a little different. As far as I know, Taijiquan uses the yi aspect of the shen to lead chi and subsequently you get jin power due to yi leading chi which leads jin, as described in the classics.


Shaolin, on the other hand use li, or brute force to somehow lead chi by contract/relax actions of the muscles in coordination with breathing. The energy then flows into the meridians via this mechanism. It is similar to Yi Jin Jing methods I believe. So one uses li and the other uses yi, I wonder if this develops a different quality of internal force as well and perhaps one is more superior than the other?




1b) In Yang Pan Hou's 40 Chapters I have read regarding 2-man Push Hands sensitivity training that Zang San Feng said in brief and to the nearest meaning, “to seize the female within our own bodies is not as good as the interaction of yin and yang between two males.” This is concerning the idea of xue jin and placing the force of the opponent in the dan tian. Would Sifu kindly be able to explain more about what Zhang San Feng meant by this statement and how it works in practice? Do Shaolin practitioners work with this idea or is it purely a training for Taijiquan practitioners?



Jp571

Answer (Contd)

... About 3 centuries later in the 19th century Yang Lu Chan learned Taijiquan from Chen Zhang Qing. Yang Lu Chan brought Taijiquan out of the Chen Village and taught it to the public. He transmitted Taijiquan to his two sons, Yang Pan Hou and Hang Jian Hou. Yang Jian Hou taught his son, Yang Deng Fu, who modified Taijiquan into a form that is now practiced as Yang Style Taijiquan.

Most Taijiquan practitioners and the general public regard Yang Lu Chan as the First Patriarch of Yang Style Taijiquan. Actually what Yang Lu Chan practiced and used to defeat challengers all over China to earn his enviable nickname, Yang the Invincible, was Chen Style Taijiquan. Yang Style Taijiquan was primarily evolved by Yang Deng Fu.

As I interpret it, “reversing the process of Shaolin” as mentioned in the Taijiquan classic, Forty Chapters by Yang Pan Hou, means the process of practicing and progressing in Taijiquan is the reverse of that in Shaolin Kungfu.

In Shaolin Kungfu, one starts form hard and external, and progresses to soft and internal. In Taijiquan, one starts from soft and internal, and progresses to hard and external.

This is the general progression for students. A high level Taijiquan or Shaolin master is bot hard and soft, internal and external at the same time. Those who can be hard or external when they want to be hard and external, and can be soft and internal when they want to be soft and internal, are only at the intermediate level. Those who can only be hard and external, or soft and internal are at the novice level regardless of how long they may have trained.

The hallmark of Zhang San Feng, however, is not “reversing the process of Shaolin”. His hallmark, for which we in Shaolin Wahnam are very grateful, was to integrate the physical form of kungfu, the internal force of chi kung, and the spiritual cultivation of meditation into one unity. In other words, when Zhang San Feng practiced Taijiquan, or Wudang Shaolin Kungfu as it was known at his time, he practiced kungfu, chi kung and meditation at the same time.

This was not so before Zhang San Feng, even amongst top Shaolin masters. When a Shaolin kungfu master wanted to develop internal force, he had to practice chi kung exercises separately. When he wanted to cultivate spiritually, he had to practice meditation exercise separately.

The invaluable legacy of integrating kungfu, chi kung and meditation into one art will be taught at the Legacy of Zhang San Feng course at the UK Summer Camp. In other words, when students practice a Wudang Shaolin Kungfu set, nowadays usually called a Taijiquan set, they will acquire combat efficiency, internal force and spiritual joys at the same time. There is no need to practice kungfu, chi kung and meditation separately.

Most people, including most Shaolin practitioners, think that Shaolin Kungfu is hard and external, and Taijiquan is soft and internal. I am glad that you are one of the very few who realise this as a misconception.

As I have mentioned a few times, which may make many people angry, there are more soft and internal aspects in Shaolin Kungfu than all the internal arts put together. I am only stating the truth, and the statement is never meant to belittle the internal arts, like Taijiquan, Baguazhang and Xingyiquan. In fact it implies that practitioners of internal arts are smart: they start at the beginning what Shaolin practitioners will learn at an advanced level, if they have the endurance and good luck to reach it.

On the other hand, Taijiquan is a wonderful internal martial art, but there is nothing internal and there is nothing martial in the Taijiquan practiced by more than90% of practitioners today all over the world. Again, this statement is never meant to belittle them, but to stimulate them so that they can derive the wonderful benefits of Taijiquan.

While your description that yi (intention) of shen (mind) leads chi (energy) resulting in jin (internal force) is emphasized in Taijiquan, it is found in all kungfu styles in developing internal force, as our students in Shaolin Wahnam can verify from their personal experience.

When our students practice Lifting Water, for example, they enter Tao. This is the shen aspect. As they lift up their arms and gently breathe in, they first visualise and later realise cosmic energy entering their body. As they lower their arms, the first visualise and later realise cosmic energy flowing into their arms and sinking into their dan tian. This is the yi aspect. After repeating their movements about 30 times, they have developed internal force. This is the jin aspect. ...

Part 3 and some more videos to follow

[barrys]

How did Zhang San Feng develop Tai Chi Chuan

Here is another part of the interview with Sifu in the lead up to this year's Summer Camp and the Legacy of Zhang San Feng course

http://shaolin-training.com/how-zhang-san-feng-develop-taijiquan/

[barrys]

Question and Answer - 1 - Part 3

Question and Answer - 1 - Part 3

Question 1 (Original question)

1a) I am a practitioner of mainly Taijiquan (Yang Style) but my knowledge on the origins of Taijiquan is very basic. I have heard that Taijiquan was invented by Zhang San Feng and in some of the Taijiquan classics (such as Yang Pan Hou’s 40 Chapters) it says that Zhang created Taijiquan by essentially “reversing the process of Shaolin.” Would you please be able to explain exactly what process of his Shaolin training Zhang San Feng reversed. 



Please note the following text which explains my previous knowledge of Shaolin and Taijiquan as I have come to understand them, which might help in explaining my question, and also I would like to let Sifu know the extent of my existing knowledge (rightly or wrongly) so that Sifu can help to clarify where I may be lacking in knowledge on account of the following bold description:



I know some say that Shaolin is not internal and Taijiquan is, is wrong on account of the former i.e. Shaolin is an internal art but I think the way in which Shaolin and Taijiquan are internal is a little different. As far as I know, Taijiquan uses the yi aspect of the shen to lead chi and subsequently you get jin power due to yi leading chi which leads jin, as described in the classics.


Shaolin, on the other hand use li, or brute force to somehow lead chi by contract/relax actions of the muscles in coordination with breathing. The energy then flows into the meridians via this mechanism. It is similar to Yi Jin Jing methods I believe. So one uses li and the other uses yi, I wonder if this develops a different quality of internal force as well and perhaps one is more superior than the other?




1b) In Yang Pan Hou's 40 Chapters I have read regarding 2-man Push Hands sensitivity training that Zang San Feng said in brief and to the nearest meaning, “to seize the female within our own bodies is not as good as the interaction of yin and yang between two males.” This is concerning the idea of xue jin and placing the force of the opponent in the dan tian. Would Sifu kindly be able to explain more about what Zhang San Feng meant by this statement and how it works in practice? Do Shaolin practitioners work with this idea or is it purely a training for Taijiquan practitioners?



Jp571

Answer (Contd)

... This principle operates not just in dynamic or moving exercise, but also in quiescent or stationary exercises. In Three-Circle Stance, for example, students first enter Tao. This is the shen aspect. Then they let cosmic energy flow into their dan tian and root them in their legs. This is the yi aspect. After about 10 minutes of stance training, they have developed internal force. This is the jin aspect.

The same principle operates in internal force training in all kungfu styles in our school. In One-Finger Shooting Zen of Shaolin, Santi Stance of Xingyiquan or Siu Lin Tou of Wing Choon Kungfu, for example, students enter into a heightened level of consciousness, let cosmic energy flow along the arms and accumulate at the dan tian, and develop internal force. This is using yi aspect of shen to develop jin. In the terminology used in our school, we enter into a chi kung state of mind, generate an energy flow, and consolidate the energy into internal force.

Your description of Shaolin practitioners using li or brute force to lead chi by contracting and relaxing certain muscles in coordination with breathing is considered an incorrect method in our school, although some practitioners, including masters, use this method. When these practitioners contract their muscles, they will be unable to lead chi, but cause energy blockage instead, and the energy will not flow into their meridians. It is bad for health.

Their isometric action of contracting and relaxing their muscles can build strong muscles resulting in mechanical strength, but it is not internal force.

This is not what we do in Yi Jin Jing or Sinew Metamorphosis, although some other practitioners use this method and develop muscular strength which many people may mistake for internal force.

We do not use li, or muscular strength, to develop internal force; we use yi, or intention. When we have developed internal force, li or muscular strength will result.

Internal force is certainly superior to muscular strength. Internal force is not limited by age, size and gender. It has three archetype functions of maintaining life, enhancing life and producing better results no matter what the practitioners do! Muscular strength does not have these wonderful benefits.

“To seize the female within our own bodies is not as good as the interaction of yin and yang between two males” can be interpreted in many ways. I would also like to point out that Chinese, the language in which the classic was written, is concise, and this conciseness may not be readily understood in a translation.

The above principle, for example, applies to two male practitioners. It can also apply to two female practitioners, or a male practitioner and a female practitioner. I o not understand what you mean by “xue-jin”, but this is not important in the explanation below.

My interpretation is that to be yin when one wants to be yin, and to be yang when one wants to be yang, is not as good as when one can be in yin-yang harmony at the same time. In developing sensitivity in Pushing Hands, when a physically stronger and bigger opponent moves in to push a physically weaker and smaller exponent, the smaller exponent moves back to let the push be futile. This is “seizing the female within our body.”

Reversely if the weaker opponent moves in to push the stronger exponent, without moving his feet but using body-movement, the stronger exponent neutralises the push and immediately bounces the weaker opponent away. This is “seizing the male within our body”. This is not overtly mentioned but is understood in the conciseness of the Chinese language.

It is good if you can let your opponent’s attack be futile if you are physically smaller or weaker, or bounce away his attack if you are physically bigger or stronger. It is better if irrespective of your size, age and gender, and irrespective of your opponents’s size, age and gender, you can let his attack be futile or bounce him away as you wish. Better still if you can let his attack be futile and bounce him off, or viewing it from the other perspective, you can bounce him off and let his attack be futile.

This principle is not purely a training for Taijiquan practitioners; it is also for Shaolin practitioners. What is found in Taijiquan is also found in Shaolin Kungfu.

In our school, we apply this principle not only in Pushing Hands and other aspects of kungfu training, but also in daily life. When you enter a restaurant, for example, if a waiter bullies you and pushes you around, you can “seize the female in you” and turn his bullying into a joke and laugh it off. Or you may “seize the male in you” to tell him off. It will be better if you have yin-yang harmony at the same time, telling him off jokingly that even the waiter himself would laugh, saying something like, “Hei, you’d better be nice to me and other customers or else we’ll not give you any tips. Worse, we may not come and your boss would sack you!”

[jp571]

Question and Answer - 1 - Part 3

Many Thanks to Sifu and Barrys for the answer and providing it, been waiting for this. I am really amazed and thankful to Sifu for the level of detail that Sifu has given in response to my question and will have to read a few more times to digest it fully.
The xuejin I mentioned is commonly associated with the jin that arises from the ground when the adept can transfer the force to the feet which the adept can then use on the opponent, I think it's the jin that is commonly associated with taichi opponents bouncing each other away.

I am not sure what this is called in Shaolin styles but I am guessing it is just one of many types of jins that are utilized by both Shaolin and other Internal Martial Artists.
Looking forward to Sifu's response to the other questions

[barrys]

Question and Answer - 1 - Supplement

Hi,

I just got a PM from Sifu with a supplementary answer

Question and Answer - 1 - Supplement

Thanks to jp571 for the explanation of "xiejin". We could translate it as "throwing force", which is similar to "release force". In Chinese I would call it "shui-jin", and "release force" is "fang-jin".

In "fang jing" you push an opponent away without hurting him, in contrast with "da jing" or "hit force" where you injure an opponent even when he may remain on the spot. In "shui jing" you throw him onto the ground without causing him injury.

Like the twelve types of bridge-force in Shaolin Iron Wire, such as "pressing force", "straight force", and "separating force", the different types of force in Taijiquan like "shui jin", peng jing" and "lu jing" or "throwing force", "ward-off force" and "rolling-back force", are the same force but applied differently. As an analogy, where it is money for housing, money for food, money for entertainment, it is the same money but used for different purposes.

When you have developed internal force, with some different skills and techniques, you can use the force as "throwing force", "ward-off force" or "rolling-back force", or in Shaolin Kungfu as "pressing force", "straight force" or "separating force".

However, I disagree with some masters who describe on the internet about "shui jin", which is probably what jp571 mentioned as "xuejin" as the pronunciation is similar but tricky in Chinese and may be rendered differently into Romanized letters.

In my own experience, if I want to throw an opponent as in "shui jin", or push him away as in "fang jin", I root myself onto the ground, which means I let my energy sink down to my feet, and not let energy bounce up from the ground.

[jp571]

Hi,

I just got a PM from Sifu with a supplementary answer

Question and Answer - 1 - Supplement

Thank you to Sifu for following up with information about the "xie jin" and to Barrys for providing in such quicktime.
Sifu I do appreciate that xie and shui can be confused for one another even in my very limited understanding of Chinese and although I don't fully understand how to differentiate each one but then again I am still a beginner and I need to build up my internal force before delving into various applications. But thanks again for opening up my mind to the different types of jin, it's very important albeit an advanced topic I hope to reach the standard one day where I can begin to apply my internal force to the wonderful world of jin's

This answer has reminded me of one quote attributed to Chen Fake, from either his or his disciples writings, to the nearest recollection that Chansi Jin includes all jins rather than peng jin (not the ward-off posture but the soft springy quality which one develops through constant training) as being the one that taichi adepts say is present in all jins specific to taijiquan jins that are defined by the 13 postures.

Would be nice to put side-by-side the jins as defined by taijiquan and shaolin and compare everything from their Chinese linguistics to actual usage and practical applications

[jp571]

Thank you to Sifu for following up with information about the "xie jin" and to Barrys for providing in such quicktime.
Sifu I do appreciate that xie and shui can be confused for one another even in my very limited understanding of Chinese and although I don't fully understand how to differentiate each one but then again I am still a beginner and I need to build up my internal force before delving into various applications. But thanks again for opening up my mind to the different types of jin, it's very important albeit an advanced topic I hope to reach the standard one day where I can begin to apply my internal force to the wonderful world of jin's

This answer has reminded me of one quote attributed to Chen Fake, from either his or his disciples writings, to the nearest recollection that Chansi Jin includes all jins rather than peng jin (not the ward-off posture but the soft springy quality which one develops through constant training) as being the one that taichi adepts say is present in all jins specific to taijiquan jins that are defined by the 13 postures.

Would be nice to put side-by-side the jins as defined by taijiquan and shaolin and compare everything from their Chinese linguistics to actual usage and practical applications

Just checking this thread again and I was thinking that my response above could be seen as me subconsciously asking Sifu for jin explanations and usage from both shaolin and taijiquan as Sifu has experienced and to compare them - Oops!
Well, maybe if Sifu gets time and decides to throw out a bonus question at the completion of the 10 requests that could be one but Sifu has already been generous with his information but just in case he feels like it

[barrys]

What benefits should you get from practising Tai Chi Chuan?

The next in the series of interviews with Grandmaster Wong Kiew Kit leading up to this year's Summer Camp. Here he explains the benefits you should be getting if you practice Tai Chi Chuan. Very special.

http://shaolin-training.com/what-benefits-should-you-get-from-practicing-tai-chi-chuan-taijiquan/

[Andrea]

I haven't posted much here, but I very much enjoy Sigung's answers both in writing and in the interviews.
Thank you Sigung! And thank you Barry Sisook for maintaining this thread.

Gratefully
Andrea