Hi everyone.
I'm starting this thread in an effort to continue where I left off with the "Discerning Real From False in Writing" thread. The idea for this thread was specifically sparked by Yeniseri's comments in the "Dr. Yang Jwing Ming Chin-Na Videos" thread. In this regard, I should thank Yeniseri for raising an important issue.
However, much of this post will be spent picking apart Yeniseri's posts. I do this so that readers can benefit from watching me reveal the falsity of his statements. I want it to be clear that I am not attacking Yeniseri personally. This forum is dedicated to spreading quality information. In this regard, I do my best to correct falsities wherever I see them. The purpose of this thread is not only to correct Yeniseri's falsities, but to raise awareness among our readers so that, in the future, they can do it for themselves.
In the "Dr. Yang Jwing Ming Chin-Na Videos" thread, Yeniseri made 11 comments. I will now analyze them one at a time. This will be a long thread, so please bear with me.
Yeniseri's premise is that I am incorrect, and that he is in a position to correct me. He presents himself as an authority. This premise is false, as we will see below. In short, I will show that Yeniseri doesn't know what he is talking about. Of course, I also present myself as an authority, but I have creditials for all to see. For example, I openly reveal my full name, my picture, countless videos, and I am authorized to teach by Sifu Wong. More importantly, I write in a way that makes the truth clearer, not more obscure. For example...
This statement shows that Yeniseri doesn't know what he is talking about. The statement is nonsensical, and it is important to recognize it as such. This is where mental clarity is essential, and where our training can really help us. It also reveals that Yeniseri's training does not bring him mental clarity.
Let's rearrange his sentence, and see if it makes any more sense: Kicking has within it chin-na, striking, pushing, throwing and so on. Obviously, this statement is false. Kicking is kicking, and doesn't include chin-na. Similarly, chin-na is chin-na, and doesn't include kicking. Unlike Yeniseri, I call a spade a spade. Chin-na is chin-na, kicking is kicking, and punching is punching. Of course, I can simultaneously apply chin-na while kicking, but that is not a case of chin-na having kicking within it; it is a case of simultaneously applying chin-na and kicking. Simple.
This statement is false. For starters, Yeniseri doesn't even spell Chin-na correctly. There are several different spellings, like "qin-na", but in all spellings, the first word, "Chin", should have an "n." Yeniseri consistently spells the first word as "Qi", which reveals that he doesn't understand Chinese. The first word, "Chin", means catch; "Na" means grip. The destructive aspect of chin-na is in the "na" or grip. The "catch" is supportive.
This is another blatantly false statement that anyone with common sense can recognize. Chin-na is done with the hands. We cannot "catch" with our feet any more than we can throw a ball with our feet. While applying chin-na, we can use our feet to trap or lock our opponent, but the feet cannot apply chin-na. They simply cannot catch or grip, unless you are a gorilla. The feet are used for trapping and locking, not for chin-na. Only the hands can apply chin-na. Once again, I am calling a spade a spade.
Imagine that you kick your opponent, and you hold him with your hands while kicking. In Yeniseri's format, this would be and example of: "kicking is not relegated to the legs, and the hands are part of the equation." Of course, this is false. Kicking is kicking. You need not use your hands to kick, although you may do so if you choose.
A kick is not part of chin-na. A kick is a kick; chin-na is chin-na. You may, if you are skillful, execute a kick and a chin-na at the same time. This is, quite simply, executing a kick and a chin-na simultaneously; it does not make the kick "part of chin-na." Once again, you can apply the chin-na without the kick, or execute the kick without the chin-na.
False. To extend outward is to extend outward. You can extend outward with your hand, as in a punch, or with your leg, as in a kick. You can also extend outward with your stance, as in moving forward in the Bow-Arrow stance, but this is not kicking.
False. When you kick, you kick; you do not trap. When you trap, you trap; you do not also kick. You cannot kick and trap simultaneously; you must do one or the other. We can kick and THEN trap, or we can trap and THEN kick, but kicking and trapping are separate techniques. They are also different from chin-na, although they may be combined in various ways. Yeniseri doesn't seem to have the mental clarity to see the difference.
This is both false and misleading. We need form to learn and apply chin-na. In the videos, Dr. Yang uses specific stances, arm movements, and body positioning to subdue his opponent. This is form. Without it, there would be no chin-na. Of course, form is not enough. Having skill (and force) is essential, but form is a basic requirement.
This is an example of Yeniseri being irresponsible. He acts like an authority, but those with mental clarity can see that he is not. Yeniseri's statement implies that Dr. Yang is wrong because he markets his chin-na videos with demonstrations of form (which Yeniseri says is unnecessary). Of course, one needs form for chin-na, as I already mentioned. Dr. Yang is not marketing form, but rather generously sharing his skills with the public. Form is a part of that equation.
It is both irresponsible and disrespectful for Yeniseri to make the above statement. Dr. Yang Jwing Ming is a world-renowned authority on chin-na. I myself have met and learned from Dr. Yang, and many of us in Shaolin Wahnam, including Sifu Wong, hold him in high esteem. We are grateful for his generosity in sharing his knowledge so openly.
This statement implies that my view would be invalid from other people's perspective. This, of course, is false. What I have explained is not my personal view, but the established view in kungfu culture. Yeniseri is welcome to argue his point here, but I suspect his words will only strengthen my point.
Finally. A true statement!
In summary
Out of the 11 statements in Yeniseri's post, 10 were false. And yet, Yeniseri writes as if he is an authority. He regularly gives advice on this forum, but at least 91% of the time, his advice is false and/or misleading.
However,his posts are not a total waste. We can, for example, use them to practice revealing false statements, as I have done here. This will be a good exercise in applying the mental clarity that we gain from our Shaolin training.
If we are going to pass these arts to posterity, we must be diligent in our efforts to spread qualilty information. In this regard, we must also make efforts to stop the spread of misinformation. That is one of the purposes of this forum, so please take full advantage of the opportunity, both here and in other threads.
Best to all,
I'm starting this thread in an effort to continue where I left off with the "Discerning Real From False in Writing" thread. The idea for this thread was specifically sparked by Yeniseri's comments in the "Dr. Yang Jwing Ming Chin-Na Videos" thread. In this regard, I should thank Yeniseri for raising an important issue.
However, much of this post will be spent picking apart Yeniseri's posts. I do this so that readers can benefit from watching me reveal the falsity of his statements. I want it to be clear that I am not attacking Yeniseri personally. This forum is dedicated to spreading quality information. In this regard, I do my best to correct falsities wherever I see them. The purpose of this thread is not only to correct Yeniseri's falsities, but to raise awareness among our readers so that, in the future, they can do it for themselves.
In the "Dr. Yang Jwing Ming Chin-Na Videos" thread, Yeniseri made 11 comments. I will now analyze them one at a time. This will be a long thread, so please bear with me.
It is I who must correct your misunderstanding while saying your view is a good one.
Originally posted by 2
Let's rearrange his sentence, and see if it makes any more sense: Kicking has within it chin-na, striking, pushing, throwing and so on. Obviously, this statement is false. Kicking is kicking, and doesn't include chin-na. Similarly, chin-na is chin-na, and doesn't include kicking. Unlike Yeniseri, I call a spade a spade. Chin-na is chin-na, kicking is kicking, and punching is punching. Of course, I can simultaneously apply chin-na while kicking, but that is not a case of chin-na having kicking within it; it is a case of simultaneously applying chin-na and kicking. Simple.
Originally posted by 3
Originally posted by 4
Imagine that you kick your opponent, and you hold him with your hands while kicking. In Yeniseri's format, this would be and example of: "kicking is not relegated to the legs, and the hands are part of the equation." Of course, this is false. Kicking is kicking. You need not use your hands to kick, although you may do so if you choose.
Originally posted by 5
Originally posted by 6
Originally posted by 7
Originally posted by 8
Originally posted by 9
It is both irresponsible and disrespectful for Yeniseri to make the above statement. Dr. Yang Jwing Ming is a world-renowned authority on chin-na. I myself have met and learned from Dr. Yang, and many of us in Shaolin Wahnam, including Sifu Wong, hold him in high esteem. We are grateful for his generosity in sharing his knowledge so openly.
Originally posted by 10
Originally posted by 11
In summary
Out of the 11 statements in Yeniseri's post, 10 were false. And yet, Yeniseri writes as if he is an authority. He regularly gives advice on this forum, but at least 91% of the time, his advice is false and/or misleading.
However,his posts are not a total waste. We can, for example, use them to practice revealing false statements, as I have done here. This will be a good exercise in applying the mental clarity that we gain from our Shaolin training.
If we are going to pass these arts to posterity, we must be diligent in our efforts to spread qualilty information. In this regard, we must also make efforts to stop the spread of misinformation. That is one of the purposes of this forum, so please take full advantage of the opportunity, both here and in other threads.
Best to all,
Comment